My niece went to summer campy for about a month and wrote me a letter when she first arrived. As "cool uncle" (suck it Mac!) I usually send lots of letters and care packages to the kids when they're away. Last time they went to camp there was a prohibition on food/cookies/candy as it caused all sorts of pest problems. I wasn't planning on any contraband, but at the boys' camp all packages have to be opened in the presence of a counselor. In my day, the worst you might get were Snap-N-Pops, and cookies were
totally allowed and made you a rock star for the afternoon. These days I'm guessing they are checking for food, fireworks, or pot. (really? drugs? Things were sooo different in the 70s. Some of the counselors may have blazed up, but we had no idea.)
I spent a couple of days and about a hundred bucks picking out little fun things for camp care packages for Ellen, and then bought lots of shipping supplies. I got things like lightsticks, plastic snakes and mice, glow in the dark things, mini LED clip, inflatable beach balls, San Francisco ball caps and t-shirts, things to share with friends, small fans, feather boa (you never know—they have dances and talent shows)— little bits of silly camp fun. I bought enough supplies and postcards to send her a package and a letter every other day for her camp session. Every time I dropped another parcel in the post I felt a little swell of happy knowing I was sending something fun to Ellen, and imagining that lift we always got when the cabin mailbox had a slip in it indicating you got a package.
So imagine how completely pissed off I was when weeks later I stared getting "you've got a package at the post office" slips at my own door and had to take to time to deal with my local post office only to be receiving these every few days.
Holy fucking shit, the camp refused
all care packages and "large envelopes" under a blanket "no package" policy. And of course I only find this out
after I mailed over a dozen of them. I was livid. I can get wanting to avoid contraband and any "have versus have nots" spats among the mean girls, but such a blanket policy regardless of knowing what is being sent just made me angry and exceedingly frustrated. I got into one of those sort of deep arguments in my head, imagining myself yelling in these censors faces, then imagining myself sneaking into camp and defiantly leaving the packages on her bed, then deciding just to send all packages via owl like Harry Potter, only this one would claw the eyes out of anyone who interfered.
Clearly, this struck a nerve. Anyone who censors anything, particularly mail, pisses me off. And yes, while I suppose the camp is in fact operating
in loco parentis, it still bothered me that they flat out refused mail that was not addressed to them without the recipeint's consent. I wasn't entirely sure how legal it was to interfere with the federal mail addressed to someone else, even if they are considered a tenant on their property.
Perhaps I was thrown into such a tizzy because the "refused delivery"stickers were so fucking smarmy. I'm sure the intent was to inform and placate the sender but it has the opposite effect.
.
Do they really
know she has everything she needs? Perhaps this insulin would have been helpful. Or certain knowledge of the love and affection of her family. Or news from home. Or a connection with her far-flung and rarely seen Uncle? Each of these had letters inside, which were denied delivery to their addressed recipient. Are baseball caps and a feather boa so scandalous that any possibility of such must be guarded against? Regardless of the other contents, should personal correspondence be denied? Clearly I'm on "no."
What annoyed me most was the amount of effort and attention I put into a month-long campaign of affection for my niece away from her family (and with whom I am trying to bond as she grows up so far away from me), but as far as she knew, she was sending me letters but I was ignoring her.
That's what really sent me over the edge on this one. To the person who refused delivery: Hey, this isn't addressed to you. Back your shit off.
Okay, okay, I get it,
I get it. Nanny businesses often have to enact blanket policies, but more often than not this manifests itself in idiocy, indicating that if employees don't have enough good judgment to make good decisions
without a blanket policy, they are going to make really bad ones
with it. Typical example: That girl who was expelled from school under a zero tolerance for drugs policy because she had Midol in her purse for PMS. Or the four-year-old expelled for sexual harassment because he kissed a girl. Or the TSA and the Bush administration's persisting war on moisture.